IE 8 is no better

Today I spent a long time debugging an error in IE8 that said "Object doesn't support this property or method."  It was in some testing code. The line was:

  hello=$('#divName');

This works perfectly in Firefox.

The solution? You're gonna love this. "hello" is a reserved word in IE. Change it to:

xxx=$('divName');

Works.

Oh, but that's not all. IE8 has it's own definition of window.setTimeout(). 

The rest of the world defines it thus:

setTimeout(function, milliseconds, arguments);

The 'arguments' are passed to the function when the 'function' is called after the timeout.

IE? 

setTimeout(function, milliseconds, language);

Language? It very nicely explains that you can't pass arguments to the callback function. It doesn't explain why it doesn't do this obvious thing that everyone else does.

Solution?

timeoutProxy= function(func, milliseconds, scope, args) {

    if ($.browser.msie == true) {
            setTimeout(function() {
                        func(scope, args) 
            }, milliseconds);
        }
        else {
            setTimeout(func, 1000, scope, args);
        }

    }

timeoutProxy(setAcceptClicks, 500, this, {});

Arrgggh!!

Getting back to JavascriptMVC

Having decided on a basic navigation tool, I needed to get it from demo-land to actual implementation.

First thing, I had to decide a million things about the actual structure and this is hard for me. I have three full levels of control. The topmost basically comes down to a set of departments, each having a set of functional roles that each require some set of tools. Last time I was using an MVC framework, the navigation was separate from the mvc setup. This didn't seem right so I made a navigation controller. This, of course, means that I have to figure out inter-controller communications. I also have to figure out an addressing structure.

Remember, this is javascript. There are no real URLs. There is exactly one html file and any url goes to it. What I want to do is make it so that URLs look normal and are meaningful. If I can't find a way to update the URL in the menu bar, I will go for a specific bookmark user interface widget where the user will be able to copy a link that will work. JavascriptMVC has some function that purports to do this. It looks like it relies on the URL anchor (#). I'll change that if I can. I want perfectly clean URLs.

It wasn't too hard (ha!). I made a class for navigation elements, set a click listener for them. I use the id of the control to tell me the 'path' which I will use as if it came from the original page entry using a bookmarked URL.

The URL is structured as http://domain.com/Department/Role/Tool/arg1/arg2. And here I find another issue. The usual MVC URL structure is http://domain.com/Controller/Action/args. That suggests that the Department field would correspond to the controller.
Eventually, I decided to count from the other end. Considering the last two to be the Controller/Action and that makes more sense to me. So, I name the controllers, "DeptnameRolenameController" and it will have, among other things, some methods called "Toolname". The real use for the department is to name a DIV that will serve as a canvas for it's controllers and to change the toolbar that is displayed.

My current problem is that I can't figure out how to communicate to my controllers. The current structure is that the navigation controller receives a navigation click. It figures out what controller and action needs activation. Presently, I issue a 'navigationClick' event. All of my appropriate controllers listen for it, check the path that is sent with it and do what comes naturally, ie, ignore it or act on it. This has the advantage that I can have non-navigation things pay attention to the event, logging comes to mind.

The downside is that I've had some trouble making sure that all events get processed in the right order when there are several listeners. It also seems a little wasteful to have all controllers listening. I'd like to be able to simply address the controller.action() but I can't.

I fully believe that I am missing something fundamental but have not been able to figure it out. I have tried everything I can think of. Fortunately, publish/subscribe works.

User Interface

Things have been a little vague lately. At the end of last week and Monday, I finally got clean Ajax communication twixt hither and yon. JSON.NET, it turns out, does a fine job of sending the object. I haven't taken the time to understand the algorithm exactly but it contains data deeply enough to support my current requirement. As I get past the demo phase, I'm sure I will revisit the topic. I actually made the old demo, category list that clicks to reveal a list of details, work. It made for a good boundary.

So, I turn my mind to user interface. I have an incumbent application with a particularly old-school user interface. It works surprisingly well but it's looks stodgy. I figure I need to find an approach that does two main things: organize a lot of complexity into some sort of workspaces or toolsets or something, and have some snap so that this thing sells once it's complete.

I actually spent a couple of days reading about user interface. I am amazed at how little real discussion there is. There's Jacob Nielsen, of course. He's really the main game if you are interested in learning things about user interface. In two days, the only practical advice was his. His 2008 best apps on the web list included the observation that toolbars has won. He had been reluctant before, but a number of the best apps had made good use of them.

I looked around for some info on that idea and found that the world is surprisingly short of straightforward user interface frameworks. Seems like imagination in the jquery world ended at with tabs and widgets. Eventually though, I found two toolbar packages. Both were pretty nice. One, however, was abandoned. The other had a nice thing it calls a backstage. A menu in the upper left that opens an overlay page structured into a two level heirarchical menu and an information pane (though I haven't been able to get the info pane to work yet). You can check it out HERE.

Actually, that's V2.0. The guy has something else he wants to do with it but hasn't gotten around to it. He says, no repository, just grab the code.

That's cool with me and I did. 

Custom Error Page IIS7

Just spent a happy hour or so debugging misleading error messages to find out that Microsoft requires an obscure second action to activate custom error pages in addition to setting a custom error page.

To serve a custom page on an error (in my case, 404), you go to the IIS control panel, select the site and double click on the icon marked Error Pages.

This will give you a nice list of the usual error messages. You can double click on one of them and, using the handy browse button, select your new error page.

Then you can go to a web browser and induce an error (in my case, typing the domain with a gibberish page name). You may be rewarded with a 500 error message that says that you cannot have an absolute file path in website.config, or some such (sorry I didn't get it exactly). You will look at the path name, read other path names, and eventually change the "C:" to "%SystemDrive%". This may reward you with more complicated error messages.

Eventually, it will give you a 404. Hooray, that's what I was looking for. Except that it's the standard page. You may spend more time trying to figure out how you misrepresented the file name. You may notice the Feature Settings button and try it. Putting the file path into its Custom Page field won't work either.

It turns out that you need to click the radio in the Feature Settings that says, "Custom Page." Then it will pay attention to the fact that you entered a custom page already.

Do I sound bitter?

nHibernate and JSON.NET

This is a problem with LINQ to SQL as well, or maybe it's just a problem with the .NET JSON converter. Whichever, the problem is that the retrieval from database to an object graph produces data that, when given to Json(), produces an error claiming that it has discovered recursion. Of course, it's right. A Relationship object links to a Patron object that contains a list of relationships (one to many) each of which links back to the Patron which has a list of Relationships.

My initial plan was to write something that prunes the object before sending it to Json(). This is a tricky bit of work and the general case still eludes me. But, along the way, a coworker told me about JSON.NET, a converter that is claimed to be vastly superior. So far, it is. At first, it produces the same error. However, it has a setting, "ReferenceLoopHandling.ignore," that makes it go away.

I'm not sure if the resulting data structure is complete (there is evidence that it prunes a little too much) or if it has more settings to make it work better. Still, it's a start.

Sometimes Things Work

I'm working toward a routine that prunes nHibernate object graphs (that's what the cool kids call them) so that they can be serialized for JSON transmission without getting an error because it's recursive. In the process, I've been experimenting with ways of handling objects retrieved by NH. Bottom line, it is easy and works the way one would hope. In particular, I have retrieved a triple object, people, bars and relationship from the people side, then changed the data on some of the relationship records. A simple flush() and the correct records get back to the database with changes in place. The amount of not having to write a bunch of save routines I am enjoying is marvelous. Similarly, I made a routine to populate the database and it works nicely, too. FYI

IIS7 Static Variables Refer to the Entire Server Context

I just had a conversation that saved my bacon BIGTIME!!

Static variables are shared across the entire server. If you declare a static variable in your web application and have ten thousand people using it, when one of them does something that sets the variable, it changes it for everyone. There does not appear to be a way to create any sort of global variable that is not also universal.

The workaround is to use the http session object instead (though this is a crime, in my opinion).

DataType ShouldBeStatic = (DataType) System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Session["ShouldBeStatic"];

What I can't believe is that this isn't emblazoned all of the universe when you google ".NET tutorial". There is nothing like it in the LAMP world. I can't imagine what sort of problems I would have suffered if I had not learned this and then the problems of going through an entire application to fix it. Bullet Dodged!

Reorganize a Visual Studio Project

I have been working on this project for a month. When I started, I didn't know anything about it and was inexperienced in .NET development. As a result, I created a project file structure that I do not like and will not work as the effort, and team, grows. This week is the week to get a code repository up and to create a testing/demo web server. That means it is also time to organize the files correctly.

What I want to do is simple. I want to rename my projects from their idiosyncratic starter names to, and I quote, UserInterface, DatabaseModel, TestProject. I want to move them out of their default directory and into one that is named after the project and is structured so that I can manage other things. The initial structure is to be, SourceCode (home to the three named above), SharedSoftware (home to nHibernate, mbUnit, etc), and ManagementFiles (home to stuff that arguably should not be in source control, especially Virtual Studio control files).

This would be, in my old world, about two hours work, and that would include reconfiguring Apache to point at the new directories. In my new world, I have just completed the chore and it has taken a full day, a good eight hours. 

Among the reasons for this is the fact that, in true Microsoft fashion, they make no provisions for user flexibility. Specifically, they knit VS projects together with a "solution" file (.sln) that is hard-coded into the file system. It cannot be moved, nor can the code it manages. Worse, it insists on storing it in the middle of the source code. Anyone else that downloads the project is stuck with your preferences. It appears to combine the very worst combination of traits. Make catastrophic by the fact that Microsoft has provided no tool to edit this thing or to relocate the project. I have tried one million things. It is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

But, I did devise a way to do it (including the relocation of the .slnfiles) and here is the story...

Reprise, the goals:

1) rename projects
2) create new directory structure (with .sln outside SourceCode)
3) put existing code into it
4) make it work correctly with Visual Studio

And an idiosyncracy: I prefer to divide the projects into separate solutions. The more usual way is to have one "solution" containing several projects. I prefer this because it allows me to have a separate, complete window for each solution. This is not possible for projects within a solution. Consequenlty, the three projects listed above, will each become a separate solution, each in its own directory. (Where needed, they refer to each other by reference.) This means that there is a .sln for each of them. My solution is the ManagementFiles directory inside of which I have directory, SolutionFiles, and inside that, one called, tqwhite. This is so that other people can store their own solution files without stomping on mine.

How to do it:

1) back up!!

2) create your new directory structure (inside ManagementFiles, create the SolutionFiles directory but not ones for each sub-project, VS will do that later)

3) distribute your source code into it; remove the .sln and .suo, keep the .csproj

4) open visual studio; if you moved, not copied, your source, when you select each solution, it will tell you it's lost and ask to remove it; say yes

For each sub-project:

5) sub-project, create a new project (for me, it's an ASP.NET MVC Empty Project). It will ask where to put it. The correct answer is NOT "SourceCode", it goes in ManagementFiles, in the place where you want the .sln for this sub-project to reside.

6) choose the new project info, right-click and Remove it.

7) go to File->Add->Existing Project; choose the .csproj file for your source code (in the new sub-project directory); it will ask for a name, use the new one that you like

8) build the project

When you quit the project and return, you should see your new projects and they should work. If you're as lucky as me, one of the three will. I ended redoing it several times to get them all going.

You might be able to use, File->New->Project from Existing Code to add your sub-projects to the newly created (renamed and relocated) .sln files. I did it for the javascript project because I lost its .csproj.

Finally, when you move your stuff to SharedSoftware, you are going to have to reassign your projects' references.

Good GUID

I have implemented the good kind of guid, uudi.comb. It required that I change my industry supplied data type from "string" to "System.guid". This does not appear to have any adverse consequences.

Yay!

I Take It Back

Upon further experimentation... 1) if I tell the <many-to-one> to be not-null="false", it creates a correct schema that works. This new schema demonstrates that I was also wrong about the foreign key constraint. 2) With the new schema, the foreign key constraint doesn't need to be removed